Welcome to Grappy's Soap Box - a platform for insightful commentary on politics, media, free speech, climate change, and more, focusing on Australia, the USA, and global perspectives.
I almost feel guilty pointing out the same issues post after post. Yes, I am criticising the MSM (Main Stream Media) again. No surprise that much of the MSM is left-leaning. Sometimes we can adjust for the known bias. If we see any article about Israel in the NY Times, we can completely discount what they say. They not only always take a view that is critical of Israel, but also, too often, they simply print lies. Even when this is pointed out later, they will take no steps to correct the lies.
Consider the case where a misdirected rocket fired from Gaza towards Israel fell short onto a hospital parking lot, killing many people. Hamas claimed Israel had bombed the hospital, killing some 500 people. All are simply anti-Israel propaganda. You guessed it, most MSM printed the propaganda as fact. When the truth was discovered, most of the media printed retractions, pretty weak ones, but of course not the NY Times.
But that is not my focus today. Today it is about the LA riots. The anti-Trump MSM, together with the Democrats, have tried to portray these riots as 'mainly peaceful'. That description is, of course, now infamous after we experienced the summer of love in 2020 with mainly peaceful demonstrations, causing the destruction of billions in property, looting, fires, and even deaths. All mainly peaceful.
Thankfully the LA riots have not been allowed to get out of hand. After what happened in 2020 Donald Trump was not going to allow these riots to continue without direct and forecful action. He called out the National Guard and sure enough the LA police also started doing their jobs.
The media, however, was once again at their worst. Instead of reporting the facts, they acted like cheerleaders for the rioters. If only there could be some way to punish the media for inciting illegality. But I note that with some hesitation, as I know what would happen if Congress were tasked with framing such a law. No, the better way is to enforce the laws as they stand.
Dr Phil presents an enlightening perspective on how the media handled the LA Riots.
In the "now for something completely different" file, I have included this video clip of the appearance of Boston Dynamics' robotic dogs in America's Got Talent reality show. They made quite a splash and were certainly a popular act. These types of casual, friendly introductions of robots are important. They serve to demystify the machines that will no doubt integrate ever more completely into our daily lives.
A few hours ago, Israel launched its much-anticipated surprise attack on Iran. It was not unexpected, but its timing may have been. It is too soon to gauge its success, though initial reports show -
a large operation with some 200 planes
Minor reported damage to Israel from Iran's defence systems
widespread damage in many locations in Iran
targets included anti-aircraft defence, high-value military personnel, missile manufacturing sites and most importantly, nuclear weapons factories
The 'neutralization' of some senior personnel has been acknowledged by Iran, including the head of the IRGC
Iran, Khamanei has vowed retaliation, and drones have been launched against Israel
These are but a few hours after the attack, so much too early to draw conclusions.
Israel has been a victim of unwarranted aggression by Iran for decades. Iran has been threatening, has been using proxies for direct attacks and just a few months ago launched hundreds of drones and ballistic missiles against Israel. Iran has declared war on Israel and has used everything in its power to attack Israel for decades. Israel has taken this step only due to the threat of Iran developing nuclear weapons.
So, by any fair evaluation, Israel was justified, and the free world will be better off if it succeeds. Success would be the elimination of Iran's nuclear threat. Even greater success would be the elimination of the terrorist theocracy that took control of Iran in 1979.
We can all hope that Israel achieved the former, and that the freedom-loving people of Iran take the opportunity of Iran's weakness to overthrow the regime.
Biden's Autopens are multiplying. As Congress delves into the use, or likely abuse, of Biden's Autopen, we are learning more. Congressman Comer has reported that there was not a single Autopen but three. One of these was only discovered recently, and more importantly, that the 3rd Autopen had been used for signing 'hundreds of proclamations'. We have also learned that four people were involved in using the Autopen, including Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco. This is building the case for legal action against some of these for usurping the power of the President.
It now seems that, due to cognitive issues, Joe Biden was not in control of his faculties throughout much of the later years of his presidency. His 'minders' should have reported his condition and had him replaced under the 25th Amendment. Instead, they lied about his condition and usurped his power, using the autopen to forge his authorisation.
If this can be proved, it will invalidate a large number of Autopen-authorised proclamations, executive orders, and pardons and launch a myriad of court cases and prison terms. Oh, 'tis a tangled web.
The media is starting to pick this one up, so many people are covering the Autopen-gate scandal.
Given the history, I guess we shoudl not be surprised, but the IDF has uncovered the UN working with Hamas to smuggle aid to Hamas for re-sale. Israel Hayom reports that
"Newly obtained data reveal a systematic mechanism by which the Hamas smuggled goods using UN aid trucks, enriching its coffers by millions of dollars during wartime. The documentation shows direct "under-the-table" cooperation between Hamas operatives and staff of the UN's World Food Programme (WFP)."
After much protest by the climate zealotry fraternity that the Spain /Portugal blackouts at the end of April were caused by unusual atmospheric conditions and were not an ongoing issue with a high proportion of renewables in the electricity grid, everyone has gone shtum. While many knowledgeable analysts at the time pinpointed the cause as the instability caused by fluctuations in the output of renewables in the grid, the zealots rejected that this was a serious concern for renewables. The media has quickly moved on, and once more, the warnings of the experts have been ignored.
Yet, given the experts' concerns, when intermittent renewables become a significant energy source of the grid, fluctuations in the energy generated will cause a cascade that is very difficult to limit. Sophisticated automated grid management systems operate to ensure that fluctuations in frequency, which would damage the grid, are detected and the offending generators are switched out of the system.
The cascade occurs when the consequence of switching one generator out of the system, in turn, causes a fluctuation that is transmitted across the next component and so on. It is just this type of process that resulted in all of Spain and all of Portugal having a blackout. Given that Spain's grid is connected to France, why didn't the cascade continue to France? The difference is that France has sufficient non-intermittent nuclear generators that ensure that the fluctuation of losing Spain is relatively small, and gives adequate time to France's grid management system to switch Spain out of its network.
So the Achilles heel of renewables is the fluctuations that occur with changes in solar output due to clouds, or just the natural changes in wind strength. The fluctuations can be handled when renewables are a relatively small proportion of the total power, but become unstable when the grid is majority renewables.
This is the canary in the renewables coalmine! Countries that have bet the farm on 100% renewables must return to the drawing board.
Australian journalist Chris Uhlmann has followed renewables technology and government policies for some time. He has developed healthy scepticism about current Australian policies. Here is a short video of his interview with John Anderson. It is well worth a view.
Mixing some good news with the constant stream of bad, comes a recent breakthrough in medical technology. Interesting Engineering magazine's article " China’s scientists use tellurium to restore vision in mice, let monkeys see infrared" tells the story. Researchers at Fudan University of Shanghai have used the rare element Tellurium to create an artificial retina. After implanting the device into blind mice, the mice regained vision. Tellurium was used because it has the unusual property of creating electrical signals in response to stimulation by light. Since the tellurium also responds to infrared light, the artificial retina allows its recipient to 'see' infrared signals too. Of course, this is brand new technology and will take some time to reach human use; it is a breakthrough.
The past 2 weeks have seen a dramatic demonstration of Ukraine's technology and strategic cunning. In multiple attacks on Russian soil, it has decimated Russia's strategic bomber fleet, destroyed a Black Sea gas platform, annihilated a strategic Black Sea communications hub responsible for coordinating attacks on Ukraine and most recently, a train carrying some hundred military vehicles, including 7 tanks. The attacks have used high-tech special-purpose drones, and with the actions spreading from the Arctic to the Black Sea and inside Russia, demonstrate an unexpected reach. Russians are now well and truly aware of this war.
Of course, Russia is a formidable bear, and they have launched multiple attacks against Ukraine's civilians, costing lives and damage to infrastructure. Ukraine has focused only on military targets and has used precision targeting, limiting casualties but destroying expensive military assets.
Who will win this battle, the fox or the bear?
Here is another video giving details of the most recent drone attack on a train.
Although the Watergate scandal is now some 50 years old, it has become the standard by which all more recent scandals have been judged. It is the scandal of all scandals, having taken the scalp of a US president together with a whole range of accomplices on the way, many having served jail sentences. A more recent scandal is threatening to take the mantle from Watergate. It is the Autopen scandal, henceforth Autopen-gate. The questions surrounding the unprecedented use of an Autopen by the Biden administration for multiple executive orders and pardons.
Why is this a scandal? While the use of an autopen goes back to the very early years of the US. Thomas Jefferson had an early version of an autopen. So that is not an issue. While it has generally not been used for executive orders, only for routine correspondence, its use is legal whenever an Autopen is authorised by the POTUS. But there is the problem. Given Biden's now accepted cognitive issues, there is serious doubt as to his conscious authorisation of its use. Did he understand what the autopen was signing? Did he even authorise its use? If he did not authorise its use, on some pardon or executive orders, are those orders, or pardons valid? If used without authority, those who used it are guilty of serious crimes.
Autopen-gate has yet to play out. The Watergate scandal took years to run its full course, and Autopen-gate will also take some time. The potential for jail terms, cancelled pardons, and revoked executive orders is evident. At this stage, Congress and Trump have also raised the issue and are asking questions.
If it is pursued, multiple court cases will likely end up in the Supreme Court. My guess is that the use of an Autopen on executive orders and pardons will be banned.
Bill O'Reilly recently covered the Autopen scandal well in a recent video. Well worth a view.
Science fiction stories are replete with laser weapons. They are the weapon of choice in space, depicted as coloured beams of light shot like arrows at enemy spaceships to invariably turn the target into explosive debris, often with unscientific thunderous noise. Even land-based confrontations use laser pistols to shoot at enemies, again with immediate dramatic annihilation. The enemy is frequently vaporised, sometimes exploded or just eviscerated. These weapons have, however, remained science fiction until now.
Israel, among many other countries, has been experimenting with so-called directed-energy weapons, laser guns, to destroy enemy projectiles, be they aircraft, missiles, or drones. However, such laser weapons have remained experimental despite some successful testing. That has now changed. In the recent war between Hezbollah and Israel, Israel used its Iron Beam laser weapon to destroy incoming missiles and drones. Despite some limitations, it was a valuable asset in preventing missile penetration into civilian areas.
Israel's much-vaunted Iron Dome system has one major shortcoming: cost. The rockets used to destroy incoming missiles cost $50,000 each. This is a relatively expensive defence system because incoming drones may cost only a few hundred dollars.
However, Laser Weapons redress this imbalance. A single shot that can destroy an incoming drone costs only a few dollars of electric energy. This rebalances such warfare towards the defending side.
Given the widespread aerial attacks on Israel, this is a most welcome development.
However, laser weapons will not be limited to defensive roles. They can be equally used for offence and no doubt they will be.
Yesterday, Donald Trump revealed that he had an extensive telephone conversation with Putin regarding several topics, including Ukraine's much publicised successful attacks on Russia's strategic military assets, and Putin's prized bridge linking Crimea to mainland Russia. Putin threatened retaliation, of course.
We are yet to see the response, but no one will be surprised, after all, Putin does not have the same values that we have in the West. Is it because he is crazy? It appears not. However, his actions over the past two decades show he is a ruthless dictator who does not hesitate to use force to achieve his ends. He has taken complete control of Russia, and all opposition has been vanquished by fair means or foul. Journalists, politicians, and those opposing his rule have been disappeared or poisoned. His military opposition had fatal accidents. He has used his military to attack his neighbours, with great success, prior to the current Ukraine invasion. What are his objectives? Most pundits believe he wants to recreate the glorious days of the USSR. He wants Russia to have the power and respect that the USSR, achieved in its heyday. Given what we now know about the hollow carcass that regime had turned out to be, this does sound hollow. It is hard for us Westerners to understand the Russian culture and how they can tolerate Putin's brutal dictatorship. Why don't they rebel? Some insight into the Russian mind was given by Konstantin Kisin in his short but forthright presentation titled "Why Americans Don't Understand Putin".
It has only been a few days since Ukraine's remarkable surprise attack on Russia's strategic military assets, when it has pulled off another significant attack. This time it was an underwater drone that delivered structural damage to the Kerch bridge. The bridge that connects the Russian-annexed Crimea to Russia.
The extent of the structural damage to the bridge is yet to be fully assessed, but the damage to Russia's military is clearly visible. Putin, instead of delivering his planned rapid takeover of the whole of Ukraine, has been bogged down in a war that is in its 4th year. Along the way, it has lost up to 1 million men, dead and wounded, many billions of roubles worth of armaments, and incalculable political capital. Russia's military has dropped from being regarded as one of the top military forces in the world, and is now considered as an outdated paper tiger. Its only asset is its nuclear arsenal, which, although untested, remains its major deterrent from NATO's even more aggressive actions.
Again, we have to be cautious about over-cheering Ukraine's success, as we can anticipate some reaction from Russia.
In the meantime, here are some of the reports on the recent attack.
Given the Trump tornado's dismantling of Biden's 'legacy', it is not surprising that the news media have had their hands full. Never does a day pass without many opportunities for outrage at Trump's policies. Whether it be another on/off on a tariff, a district judge putting a stop order on an executive order, a failed ceasefire negotiation, the anti-Trump forces have been too busy attacking Trump to look for defending Biden's legacy. There are signs that that will change soon. There are many open questions on the Biden Presidency, including:-
Who was aware of Biden's cognitive decline and when?
Who was 'running' the country over the period when Biden could not do so?
What role did his immediate family, Dr Jill Biden, and his disgraced son, Hunter, have?
Who was in charge of the auto-pen used for signing executive orders? Many were signed by auto-pen.
Are the auto-pen executed orders legal?
Are auto-pen executed pardons legal?
Did Biden's doctor do a PSA test? If not, why not? If yes, what was the result?
When was Biden's prostate cancer diagnosed?
Who was the source of the cocaine found in the White House?
While Trump's Justice Department and FBI have been busy settling into their new roles and implementing the changes required by Trump's executive orders, there are now signs that the questions circling about Biden's presidency are receiving attention. Republicans in Congress, many of whom have been doggedly pursuing Biden's questionable business dealings, are pressing for more action, oft repeating the Democrats' mantra, 'no one is above the law. ' What goes around comes around.
I expect there will be plenty of circus in the coming months.
Yesterday's surprise ambush by Ukraine of Russia's strategic military assets reminded me of a movie from the 60s by that title. A small principality in Europe decides to declare war against the US. Why? It fully expects to lose the war, but then receive the generous aid that the US was seen to bestow on countries it conquered. Obviously, it is a comedy and pretty memorable for its premise. Ukraine is far from a small principality, and it certainly did not start this war, but yesterday it certainly roared. It pulled off a massive surprise attack on Russia's most strategic assets. The extent of the damage has yet to be determined, but the attack targeted 4 separate military sites and destroyed some 40 strategic bombers, some of which were located thousands of kilometres from Ukraine's border. By all accounts, and there are many, this was a military masterpiece, executed in total secrecy despite an 18-month implementation schedule. Experts cite this as the greatest military loss by Russia since WWII.
This is a major setback for Russia, but even a greater embarrassment for Putin. So we can expect a reaction. One could ask, "What is worse than an angry bear?", and the answer would be "A wounded bear"
CDC removes children and pregnant women from COVID Immunisation Schedule
It has been some time coming, perhaps late, but the US CDC has removed COVID mRNA vaccines from the CDC's recommended immunisation schedule for healthy children and healthy pregnant women. The announcement was reinforced on X. This is a short one, just 37 seconds.
Today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from @CDCgov recommended immunization schedule. Bottom line: it’s common sense and it’s good science. We are now one step closer to realizing @POTUS’s promise to Make America Healthy Again. pic.twitter.com/Ytch2afCLP